Thread
:
Winter Flying, pt 3 - Lighting Ski.jpg (1/1)
View Single Post
#
9
February 3rd 07, 09:39 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Art Woodbury[_1_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 5
Winter Flying, pt 3 - Lighting Ski.jpg (1/1)
In article ,
says...
Frank from Deeeetroit wrote:
"Art Woodbury" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
begin 644 Lighting Ski.jpg
I posted recently on this subject. Does anyone know why
Lightnings had the contra-rotating props on the "wrong"
sides? P-factor and torque from the outward-turning props
make both sides critical in an engine-out situation. Kelly
Johnson didn't make mistakes like this. Is there an
explanation?
Art W.
To balence out the torque generated by the two engines.
Balancing the torque is correct. But, IIRC, they
originally rotated the opposite direction (facing
craft, top rotating in), and were changed to help
resolve a buffeting problem.
Balancing torque is helpful of course, but more important
is minimizing P-factor, where you can run out of rudder
authority sooner when the critical engine is out. Inward-
turning props would help that situation a lot.
Resolving a buffeting problem is certainly a reasonable
answer. I was sure there must have been an important reason
to sacrifice engine-out handling.
Art Woodbury[_1_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Art Woodbury[_1_]
Find all threads started by Art Woodbury[_1_]