"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:32:48 +0100, "Paul J. Adam"
wrote:


and I'm
really curious as to why an iteration of a revolver cannon is allowed to
be so incompatible with its predecessor. (After all, if ADEN 25 is so
good, why not go for a common interface and hang it off Sea Harrier and
Hawk too?)

There was something exceedingly fishy about that whole process. What spin
was feed to the RAF to forgo factory fitting Harriers with equalisers ?

We couldn't afford to clone that many Edward Woodwards? :-)

Nick