"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
om...
"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...
"Frank Hitlaw" wrote in message
om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
"Frank Hitlaw" wrote in message
om...
"Tarver Engineering" jtarver@sti.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Snip
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Say what!!! I'll say it would look funny,Tarver. Sections 40 and
41
are on the front end of a Boeing it includes the cockpit and back
to
the E&E compartment. Worked on alot of Boeings never saw that one
maybe in your dreams.

Yes Frank, the nose of the 757 is grafted onto the 767 fuse. That
is
how an
educated person can tell a 767 from a 757, even at a distance.

I guess Frank hasn't been on an airport in 20 years.

John P. Tarver, MS/PE


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++
Tarver,I am a Maintenance Manager for a large aircraft leasing
company.I really work at an airport,go to one every day. I also work
on and around Boeing aircraft every day. I Have never seen a 757 nose
section grafted to a 767 fuselage. The type rating is common so the
internal layout of the cockpit is very similar. The structure is not
even close,if you grafted a 757 forward structure onto a 767 it would
look like an unfired 30-06 round. If you have a photo of a narrow body
757 section 40&41 grafted onto a wide body please post it. If not....
Frank M.Hitlaw,A&P Mechanic

Too bad tarver won't believe me when I tell him that
section 41 is the front. Guess he'll have to learn the hard way.
JK

Jim:

Is he still stuck on that section 40 thing? 747's have no section 40,
767's have no section 40, 737's have no section 40. It's section 41 on
all three.

Same with a DC-10.

BTW, section 41 on a 767 ends at FS 436 (between the third and fourth
pax window ).

Where does he dig this information up from?


I'm not sure I even want to ask. When he gives us Tarverisms like:
Yes Frank, the nose of the 757 is grafted onto the 767 fuse. That is
how an educated person can tell a 767 from a 757, even at a distance.
I guess Frank hasn't been on an airport in 20 years.

He doesn't realize that he's virtually handing victory to us in another
thread where he is proving to us that he does not know that 757s and 767s
have different types of instrument plumbing. (pitot tube vs. pitot/static
tube)

I just wish someone could get him to re-open his "autoland is illegal"
argument.
That was about the time I came in and it's been constant grins ever since.
JK