On Apr 29, 1:46 pm, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:

This is an even better source showing the decline of 100LL
consumption:

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/a403600001m.htm

Do you understand correlation vs causation?

You're simply arguing without any solid number. Just because you
believe 100LL still has a bright future doesn't mean it's true.