Thread: aerobatic C172?
View Single Post
  #18  
Old May 3rd 07, 04:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
JGalban via AviationKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 356
Default aerobatic C172?

The NTSB said :

THE AIRCRAFT WAS OPERATING IN THE UTILITY CATAGORY
OF AIRWORTHINESS ON THE ACCIDENT FLIGHT. FOR THIS CATAGORY, AT THE TIME OF
THE ACCIDENT THE AIRCRAFT WAS 323 POUNDS OVER IT'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GROSS
WEIGHT AND 3.1 INCHES BEYOND IT'S ALLOWABLE AFT C.G. LIMIT.


I think it could more accurately be said that the aircraft was NOT
operating in the Utility Category on the accident flight.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200705/1