Thread: aerobatic C172?
View Single Post
  #25  
Old May 4th 07, 05:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default aerobatic C172?

On 3 May 2007 13:03:07 -0700, wrote:

On May 3, 12:42 pm, The Visitor
wrote:
C J Campbell wrote:
The 172 may be able to stand the G forces, but that is not the only
limitation.ould not want you renting our planes.


Engine mount?


Engine mounts are good for 9 Gs. Somewhere in FAR 23, I think.


FAR 23 might not apply to a 172...it's old enough.

Ron Wanttaja