FAA's Answer to ATC Retirement Bubble Staffing Shortfall
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .
"Morgans" wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Larry Dighera wrote:
Isn't a policy that reduces staffing, and then authorizes mandatory
overtime (with its federally mandated time-and-a-half pay rate) just
a bit irrational?
I'll bet is cheaper to pay two guys for 60 hours each than 3 for 40.
You bet correctly.
When you consider the benefits, such as vacation, health insurance,
and retirement, and that by not hiring another person that will have
to get all of those benefits, you can afford to pay a lot of overtime.
Also overlooked is the cost of training. There is a large up-front cost to
add an additional controller that doesn't exist if you merely extend the
hours of already trained controllers - even if those extra hours are more
costly.
Many NA car companies (Delphi, etc) have huge ongoing costs from benefits
due to employees that have not worked for years. IIRC it amounts to ~$1400.
/current car produced. I suspect that a similar situation will apply to the
soon to retire ATC employee benefits.
|