"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"B2431" wrote in message
...

From: "Tarver Engineering"

snip

Dan, on the other hand, is a asshole running an archive troll on me
and
wanting me to be nice to him. (ie stupid)

Once again you resort to vulgar and personal attacks rather than
answer
a
simple question.

No Dan, Knoyle is an insulting ass and you are quoting his archive
troll.
There is noting professional, or friendly, about what you are doing.
You
deserve to be flamed off the board, but I have been very patient with
you.
If you feel that you are not stupid, then why do you continue to act in
a
stupid manner? I can not see how you can expect me to treat you with
any
respect at all.

You still haven't given us an example of a tome when I attacked you
personally
or otherwise. I really don't think you will ever respond civilly. Oh
well.

The archive troll is a personal attack and has been an economic attack
on
my
business for some years. If I thought Knoyle had a pot to **** in I
would
take it away, but he has the protection of nothin to lose. Unlike our
ex-NASA participants, who paid dearly for Dudley's ignorance.



Somewhere I read:
"To argue against an easily verifiable fact for a few months is stupid.
To argue against an easily verifiable fact for three years is insanity."

Knoyle, I already know you are a mental case.

All anyone has to do is compare Henri Pitot's invention to our discussion,
to know you are an idiot, jimmy. The archive troll raises you to village
idiot, but I suppose it does keep you from eating the piece.