The biggest safety investment in GA is...
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:28:19 +0200, Thomas Borchert wrote:
At the "soft" end of
that range, even a less proficient IFR pilot can save the day where a
VFR-only pilot can't.
I'm not as sure that the line between soft and hard is that hard.
A friend recently experienced an electrical failure in 300' (or worse)
IMC. That's clearly hard.
I'd a flight a couple of days ago where the ceilings were around 4000'
where there were ceilings. 20 or 30 miles from the destination, we left a
bunch of clouds for sudden CAVU.
Definitely soft, right?
But there were times when we were cotton-balled en route. That, plus the
bumping we were getting, could (I think) have caused a less proficient
pilot (not that I'm all that hot an IFR stick myself {8^) to have "lost
it". Sure, dropping below was always an option. But had that
hypothetical pilot not exercised that option...
I can still envision bad things happening.
All that said, I've also been forwarding that article to a number of
friends. I've at least one co-owner that's quite forceful in his belief
that traffic is the ultimate safety device. Of course, he *is* instrument
rated already ...
- Andrew
|