"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
.. .
"Private" wrote in message
news:ljCki.101559$1i1.27924@pd7urf3no...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville famously concludes with
a
warning of the
kind of despotism democratic nations have to fear. Tocqueville warns
that
the passion for
equality will give rise to a certain kind of degradation in which
citizens
will surrender
their freedom democratically to a tutelary power:

Above these [citizens] an immense tutelary power is elevated, which
alone
takes
charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is
absolute,
detailed, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if,
like
that,
it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary,
it
seeks
only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; it likes citizens to
enjoy themselves
provided that they think only of enjoying themselves. It willingly
works
for their
happiness; but it wants to be the unique agent and sole arbiter of
that;
it provides
for their security, foresees and secures their needs, facilitates their
pleasures,
conducts their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates
their
estates,
divides their inheritances; can it not take away from them entirely the
trouble of
thinking and the pain of living?

***

Subjection in small affairs manifests itself every day and makes itself
felt without
distinction by all citizens. It does not make them desperate, but it
constantly thwarts
them and brings them to renounce the use of their wills. Thus little by
little, it
extinguishes their spirits and enervates their souls....

Thanks for the thoughtful quote, I will read the book.
Unfortunately I think democracy has more to fear, as benign despotism
seems
to be developing a meaner edge..

Happy landings,


Aristotle, who was no fan of democracy, hypothesized that a society could
possibly oscillate between democracy and despostism--although he was
unable
to document any case in which had occurred as of the time of his teaching.
Obviously, or perhaps not, those who must give up their freedom would need
to be falsely schooled regarding their past; with the result that such a
cycle would occupy multiple human lifetimes. Based on that, and the small
amount of "news" which I can tolerate, I suspect that we may have entered
a
time of historical significance...

All the best,

Quite! If history is any guide we'll call it Dark Ages II.

Ironically, the worst collapses nations have incurred were self-imposed, not
externally imposed.


Matt
--
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious,
but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at
the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries
his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those
within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through
all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government
itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks
in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their
face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness
that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the
soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the
night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects
the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A
murderer is less to fear. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero