In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

Oh! It's WAY worse than that!

ATP's don't have instrument ratings.

Got me there :-).

Hamish



Karl



"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

I love that question!

No........I don't have an instrument rating. What does my having or not
having an instrument rating have to do with your confusion about this
approach?

Perhaps if you had an instrument rating you'd read the chart properly
and realise just how dangerously wrong you are about it...

Hell, MXmania could read this correctly.

Perhaps. But it's funny in a sick sort of way that you share with him
the fact that (since you don't have an instrument rating) it's all
theoretical for you, while you disparage people who not only give you
the right answers, but for whom getting the wrong answers might mean
serious repercussions, if not even death...

Hamish


Karl
"B" wrote in message
...
Do you have an instrument rating?

Help me understand how DME permits you to descent to 680 "far before
CULVE."

karl gruber wrote:

Not with DME, you'll be at 680 far before CULVE.

Karl
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...

On Jul 23, 1:18 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:

Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway.

No, with 800 foot ceiling you will be at 1120 when at CULVE, making it
hard to see the runway through the clouds.

-Robert