In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

Correct. When DME etc. equipped, and descending to 680 after BEVEY,
identifying CULVE does you no good, other than for situational awareness.

Then why do you think they bothered to include CULVE on the chart? And
why does being able to identify CULVE make it safe to descend to 680
after BEVEY when it would not be safe to do so without that ability?

(Note to sane readers: these are rhetorical questions designed to show
Karl that he is wrong. Which he most assuredly is.)

rg