Thread
:
Mixture--science vs witchcraft?
View Single Post
#
32
August 27th 07, 02:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
randall g
external usenet poster
Posts: 60
Mixture--science vs witchcraft?
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:44:27 -0700,
wrote:
On Aug 18, 3:43 pm, "Douglas Paterson"
wrote:
Still getting to know my new baby (1990 TB-20, normally aspirated 250hp
Lycoming IO-540). I imagine my question here must apply to most non-turbo,
non-FADEC pistons (though I gather there's some sort of altitude compensator
on some airplanes' engines?). I live in Colorado, which means routine
high-elevation airport ops.
The people who manufacture that engine, and who have lots to
lose if it quits on you, have a procedure he
http://www.lycoming.textron.com/supp...fs/SI1094D.pdf
Dan
That Lycoming document describes leaning for takeoff at high DA for
these cases:
- fixed pitch - lean for max rpm
- constant speed but no engine instrumentation - lean with smooth
operation of the engine as a deciding factor
What if I have a CS prop plus EGT, MP and fuel flow instrumentation?
randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG
http://www.telemark.net/randallg
Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at:
http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm
Vancouver's famous Kat Kam:
http://www.katkam.ca
randall g
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by randall g
Find all threads started by randall g