On Sep 8, 5:56 am, Mark Hickey wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:





On 7 sep, 07:35, Mark Hickey wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

On Sep 6, 2:36 pm, Mark Hickey wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
So far, no one's been able to
show a single quote. I'm guessing you won't do any better (though you
seem to be VERY certain of your position - I'm not sure how big a
number "umpteum" is, but all you need is one quote - should be a piece
of cake, right?).

Yep

http://www.geocities.com/jacksonthor/lieswmd.html

Is it a reading comprehension problem, or do you think "WMD" is an
acronym that has something to do with flying airplanes into buildings?

Nope, I read jjust fine.

What WMDs, btw?

The ones that the link you referenced above was talking about (rather
than the 9/11 attack, which is the subject of the question).

No, it isn't. It's what you're trying to make the question.

Ummm... look above. I am asking for a SINGLE quote to prove your
assertion that Iraq was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Ask away. I didn't make thaqt assertation, fjukkwit.

You really are as dumm as dishwater, aintcha?



You reply with a geocities.com link above that has not a thing to do
with the 9/11 attack.

Didn't say it did, fjukkktard.

Then you deny it and accuse ME of "trying to make (it) the question.

I'm trying to figure out if you're being disingenuous or just trying
to ignore the fact you couldn't come up with a single quote out of the
"umpteum" examples out there...


I'm being Bertie the Bunyip.

I'm always being Bertie the Bunyip.


It's a pure and noble calling.

Mark "what passes for logic these days" Hickey- Hide quoted text -


Nice try, propoganda minister.

Oh wait, it wasn't


Bertie