150flivver wrote in
ups.com:

On Oct 7, 7:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"The Old Bloke" wrote
:

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
.. .
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
You can distinguish all you like. Even commercial ones aren't flying
and don't even come close to duplicating flight. They're good for
practicing procedures, emergencies etc, but none of them fly like an
airplane.

Bertie

State of the art, full motion sims do a credible job of replicating
flying. There are some things they can't do very well like high g
maneuvering flight, but things like landing, takeoff, instrument
procedures, even air refueling. are done very realistically. The FAA
awards type certificates in certain airframes without any "real"
airframe time based on the quality of the simulation. I used to do
threat validation for Air Force aircrew training devices and I've seen
many different sims--some of them would give you the leans and motion
sickness just like an aircraft. I am a pilot and flew fighters.



KI know all that and I' e flown those sims. I disagree, I don't think they
do a credible job. They do enough to get by, but that's about it,.


Bertie