View Single Post
  #22  
Old October 16th 03, 08:24 PM
Vic Flintham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Marron
writes
(Kirk Stant) wrote:


Just for fun, off the top of your heads, which post-WW2 combat
aircraft (any country) have NOT been used in their intended roles in
an actual shooting war (or police action, or soccer riot, or whatever
it's called these days)?


And why?


Some ROE:


1. Combat aircraft means it was designed or modified to employ
air-to-air or air-to-ground/ship/boat weapons.


2. Combat means someone was activily shooting back (or really wanted
to) while the aircraft was performing it's mission.


3. Let's leave out recce, that just gets too complicated!


To start things off, here are my USAF candidates:


B-36 - Held back from Korea for Nuke mission.
B-47 - Too early for Korea, too late for Vietnam (remember, no recce).
F-84F - Too early for Korea (ef considered a separate aircraft from
straight-wing F-84s), too late for Vietnam. Combat use by other
countries?
F-89 - Too late for Korea (?), not needed (no bomber threat).
F-106 - Not needed in Vietnam - F-102s deployed instead.
F-101 (Yeah, I know about the RF-101 in Cuba and Vietnam). Don't know
why F-101Cs weren't used early in Vietnam. Being phased out by then?


Could be wrong, but here goes:

B-36, B-47, F-84F, F-89, F-106, F-101, F-86D, F-94C, Saab Draken, Saab
29, F-4D Skyray, F7U Cutlass, F9F (swept-wing) Cougar, Gloster
Javelin, Avro Vulcan, Handley Page Victor, Supermarine Scimitar, Fiat
G.91, English Electric Lightning, Dassault Mirage IV, Saab Viggen,
Sukhoi Su-15, Shin Meiwa, Alpha Jet, Folland Gnat, BAe Hawk, Fuji
T1F2, Supermarine Swift, Tupolov Tu-22, Tupulov Tu-26, B-58 Hustler,
Tupolov Tu-16, North American B-45, Hawker Firebrand, Tupolov Tu-20,
Hawker Siddeley Buccaneer, Hawker Sea Vixen, deHavilland Venom,
McDonnell F2H-4 Banshee, North American FJ-4B Fury, deHavilland
Vampire, Yakolev Yak-25A, Dassault Ouragen, McDonnell FH-1
Phantom, Hawker Sea Fury, Grumman F7F Tigercat, McDonnell
F3H Demon, Supermarine Attacker...

Everything else got lots of chances to do their thing.

At first glance, looks like the US taxpayer is getting a pretty good
deal for his money!

Kirk
(tired of all the non-mil av bull**** on this group)


Same.



F-84F - Suez 1956
Vulcan - Falklands 1982
Victor - possibly Borneo 1962-66
Lightning - Saudi Arabia - Yemen c1967-70
Gnat - India-Pakistan 1965, 1971
Tu-22 - Chad 1981+
Buccaneer - South Africa 1965-90, Gulf War 1991
F2H - Korea
Venom - Malaya c1956-60, Suez 1956, Aden 1956+
Sea Venom - Aden 196-
Vampire - Malaya 1951-55, Algeria 1954, Aden 1952, Tunisia 1961
Ouragan - Israel 1956, 1965
Sea Fury - Korea 1950-53

Just a few which come to mind, but then my horizons are a bit further
than my own back yard. I don't see what the question has to do with the
US taxpayer.
--
Vic Flintham
Cold war military aviation
http://www.vflintham.demon.co.uk