In article ,
®i©ardo wrote:

John Meyer wrote:
In article ,
Mike Mackenzie wrote:

®i©ardo wrote (in part):

John Meyer wrote:
Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640
makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to
900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks
like a great museum.

Hi John,

I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from
one of my previous postings.

Is the attached an improvement?

Ricardo
Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85%
resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of
the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG.

Mike

That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news
group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to
keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72
dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop.



I don't remember taking that...

;-)

Hmm - must've been me then! That's at the Planes of Fame Museum in
Chino.

--
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
- Epicurus (341- 270 BC)