John Mazor writes:

Because you posit your opinions as though they had factual support equal to those of
people who actually know WTF they're talking about.

No, I do not. That is the inference of others who interpret my lack of wimpy
deference to the alpha dogs as some sort of aggressiveness. They have a
tremendous emotional investment in everything they post and read; I do not.
Since there isn't any intrinsic emotional content in my posts, they imagine
such content and project it upon them. They cannot conceive of anyone just
participating in the newsgroup for the purpose of sharing information.

For example, your ignorant comment about extending the airline pilot age to 65:

But doesn't this mean that he'll ultimately fly longer? He may not be
thrilled over the short term, but it means five extra years at the peak of his
career.

Which begins with a question, a question that nobody has answered. What were
you saying about posting opinions as fact? Do you have an answer to the
question?