On Dec 18, 6:58 pm, WingFlaps wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" wrote:

"BradGuth" wrote in message

news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-

Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
recording?

Another literary masterpiece.

The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
about it?

Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
(apparently so)

Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.

What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?

Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
"k00k"

-c

See what I mean. (obviously not)

Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
were hiding Venus?

Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever
physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
unfiltered Kodak moments?
- Brad Guth

No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the film
latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
the moon is so slight you need digital photography and image
processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.

Cheers- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention the fact that Venus is where? CLOSE TO THE SUN!!!
Who is going to point their camera toward the sun on the moon? Talk
about lens flare! The only reason we can see Venus on the earth is
because the sun is below the horizon.