"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On Jan 9, 10:55*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:d2f44a9e-5e42-4c54-8686-a
:





On Jan 9, 10:28*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote
innews:ce584f60-334f-4485-9905-b
:

On Jan 9, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote
innews:13oa1fbo5s0erbd
@news.supernews.com:

Be able to defend himself.

I taught my wife to use the gun for self defence. Thought
better of it, then and provided her with some good alternatives
that will be much more effective on the day.

So that is your argument for taking away my right to defend
myself and my family in the way I feel is best???? Its a typical
liberal argument, "I don't want an SUV so no one should be
allowed to own one".

So, if you wanted a howitzer you should be allowed to have one?

"...The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed"

Out of context, illiterate boi.

I don't need to justify my desire to defend myself to you, nor does
any other law abiding citizen.

You do if I decide you are a threat .

That was what the constitutional founders feared most.


And they were right. But you obviously haven;t read the constitution
either.

Also, you're making presumptions about me which, even if you could read,
would render the whole argument more absurd than you could imagine.

Well, make that "tha someone who could read and actually posessed an
imagination" could imagine.


Bertie