On Feb 8, 1:11*pm, Dallas wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:42:18 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
They are quite effective else all the DUI convictions would have been thrown out.

Wikipedia seems to indicate that breathalyzers are prone to significant
error. *One might be smart to demand a blood test instead.



Wikipedia IS prone to significant error.


From Wikipedia:
SNIP

Gee, doesn't it amaze you that all of the DUI lawyers out there
haven't found this info and jumped all over it?