AviationBanter - View Single Post

**Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]** · March 7th 08, 08:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
:

On Mar 7, 11:24 am, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
news:5b78a5ee-281c-4b7d-9252-

m:

On Mar 7, 10:05 am, buttman wrote:
On Mar 6, 6:55 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Owner wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
buttman wrote:
On Mar 6, 3:13 pm, "Owner" wrote:
"buttman" wrote in message
news:5597b148-f803-4679-b40e-ea7768c139e1
@m36g2000hse.googlegrou
ps.com...
On Mar 6, 2:40 pm, Dudley Henriques
wrote:
The posts you made concerning pulling mixture on take off
involved a single engine airplane and a primary student.
No competent instructor does this REGARDLESS of the runway
remaining. The fact that you are actually defending this
idiotic and incompetent procedure is all I need to support
my initial judgment of you as a CFI.
Your feeble attempts at portraying me in the light of a
"know it all" and a "blow hard" would seem to fly in the
face of what I see from others (Ken Tucker excepted of
course) concerning your judgment on this
matter as well.
In other words, it appears that you have a judgment
problem...something
not desirable in a CFI.
--
Dudley Henriques
Did you not read the 5 paragraph post that you just quoted?
Obviously you didn't as you continue to say I pulled the
mixture. It wasn't the mixture, it was the fuel valve!
In my post I addressed my reasoning for coming to the
stance I take on this issue. I do not necessarily "support"
doing that particular maneuver.
What I do support the idea that things like pulling the
fuel valve (or anything else for that matter) CAN be done
safely as long as the proper precautions are made.
Wow, what a load of crap, but what would one expect from
someone known as
buttman?
Since you're not willing to follow
along, it only proves that you are indeed nothing but a
blowhard who is full of himself.
The thread I made over a year ago was intended to solicit
the help of this group in preparing myself for something I
thought my students could benefit from. The only thing
people wanted to do was act self- righteous, which is
exactly what you're continuing to do right now.
HHHUUURRR
wow they're really coming out of the wooodwork this
afrernoon.
Yes. Isn't it amazing how many disagree with you and/or
believe you are wrong......and isn't it amazing how you can't
seem to be able to entertain the idea that there are people on
this forum who know more than you do. So far I see not one
supporter for your idiotic assertions. Good God man, get out
of the CFI business before you kill some innocent student.
--
Dudley Henriques
If' this is the kind of CFI that's teaching today's young
pilots, then maybe it's time to take the prop off my Tiger and
hang it in my office
Fortunately, this guy is an odyssey. In 50 years being exposed
to CFI's
of all makes and models, this idiot stands out as unique. I've
never come across an instructor who not only does what this guy
claims to do with students, but who when told it's wrong,
attacks the pilots correcting him.
Pilots like this guy are an accident waiting to happen. I only
hope it doesn't happen to him.
The positive side is that what usually happens with people like
this is that after they shoot off their mouth on Usenet telling
off the pilots who disagree with them, they usually sulk on back
to the hangar and never do again what they were taken out to the
shed for. If this is the result, I'm thoroughly satisfied.
--
Dudley Henriques
This is like talking to a brick wall. I've said it a million
times, I do not agree that is is necessarily "safe" to pull the
engine on takeoff.

My argument was that is can be safe if the proper precautions
were to be made.

Also, I know you're going to find some way to wriggle out of this
one, but were you ever an MEI? Did you not do engine cuts on take
off? If you did, how did you exactly do them? How do you suggest
they should be done? Because engine cuts on takeoff are part of
the PTS. Do you not follow the PTS?

And don't try to tell me engine cuts in a twin are "safe" because
one thing can lead to another and the plane can get below Vmc.

I'm not trying to pick a fight with you, I am genuinely curious
how you can be perfectly OK with doing it in a twin, but go off
the handle when suggesting doing it in a single.
I agree with Mr. Buttman, =

As if anty moreproof were needed tha buttman is a complete tit.

Bertie

You took the words right out of my mouth :-) After 50 years in the
aviation instruction and safety business, there's nothing like
arguing these issues with a paper plane idiot and an instructor who
advocates starving an engine on take off to "teach his students
properly" To coin a phrase from a friend,
"God I LOVE Usenet!!!" :-))
Dudley Henriques

Dud, you've never been in an airplane, and you're
NOT an instructor. I'm a prof teacher and I can
sniff your bad **** off the net, you're a phony!

Mr. Buttman (appropriately) raised the question
of engine failure at rotation or ascent, I'd like him
as an instructor. Why, because he's strict.
As a prof teacher, I happen to know that a suggested
lesson should be weighed by it's merits by his peers,
and you "dud" are not near in his class, otherwise
you would have discussed the issue of anomally
in that T-O circumstance.
And that's how I know the "dud" is a web-phony.

"dud" is CHECKMATED by
Ken S. Tucker
PS: Now predicably "dud" or his "bertie" sidekick
will engage in the usual name calling, to avoid the
issue.

Yeh, right, fjukktard..

Happy?

Bertie