buttman wrote:
On Mar 7, 1:02 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
You took the words right out of my mouth :-) After 50 years in the
aviation instruction and safety business, there's nothing like arguing
these issues with a paper plane idiot and an instructor who advocates
starving an engine on take off to "teach his students properly"
To coin a phrase from a friend,
"God I LOVE Usenet!!!" :-))
Dudley Henriques
Dud, you've never been in an airplane, and you're
NOT an instructor. I'm a prof teacher and I can
sniff your bad **** off the net, you're a phony!

Mr. Buttman (appropriately) raised the question
of engine failure at rotation or ascent, I'd like him
as an instructor. Why, because he's strict.
As a prof teacher, I happen to know that a suggested
lesson should be weighed by it's merits by his peers,
and you "dud" are not near in his class, otherwise
you would have discussed the issue of anomally
in that T-O circumstance.
And that's how I know the "dud" is a web-phony.

"dud" is CHECKMATED by
Ken S. Tucker
PS: Now predicably "dud" or his "bertie" sidekick
will engage in the usual name calling, to avoid the
issue.

I agree with you 100%. If you read through his posts in this thread,
all you'll see is him insulting me, and nothing more. The reason he
won't post anything else, is because he can't. He has no idea what
he's talking about, ever.

I've knows this Dudley guy to be nothing but a fraud for years now.
The only thing that bothers me is that more people on this group don't
seem to realize this

Won't work Butt but I don't blame you for trying. It's no secret I think
you're not a good instructor.



--
Dudley Henriques