On Mar 8, 10:47*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote :





On Mar 7, 11:24*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote
innews:a529f378-4eb7-42f4-b8eb-5fce8
:

On Mar 6, 8:49*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Mar 5, 6:17 am, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:35 pm, george wrote:
On Mar 5, 4:06 pm, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

You noticed that too huh??? :-)))) Well, I guess the extra
weight he
lps
to get that ole airplane down again on the remaining runway
when you

pull that ole mixture back on a student right after rotation
:-))))
I still can't believe that some-one claiming to be a pilot
made the 'pull mixture on takeoff' statement and is still
here

What's a typo, or it there a reason?

BTW, here's a video of that x-wind landing...
http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/309221
(It ****es me off it's an amateur video, for the price
of a bit of tape, one would think all landings should
be properly video taped, cheap ****in' ****s).

Anyway, the rudder steering seems odd to me,
based on squinty frame advance...grrrr.
Ken

Weren't you the guy that was also suggesting that the runway be
subject to a walk down before every take-off?

For major airports, radar is being developed,
but I think dogs could do it faster and better.

Hey that was my idea! Do you like it really? I worry though, will
dog **** on the airport runway be a problem when projected by jet
blast? What do you think?

Well, obviously they would wear diapers.

Damn, you are smart. Depends or huggies?

We'll have to get a $4,000,000 research grant and try both.


Great idea. You deal with the **** side and I'll fly the planes!

Cheers