Matt Whiting wrote in
:

Dan Luke wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote:

I don't know anything about this petition, but how about this?

http://www.newsbusters.org/node/13541


or this?

http://www.startribune.com/local/11826671.html


Matt
Dan,

I'm still awaiting your reply. Are you still there?


Sorry, Matt; missed it.

My answer is "So what?"

The rantings of a couple of old cranks against the work of thousands
of modern scientists? Who cares?

But I know you a little, Matt. I know you distrust modern science
and are always looking for someone to tell you it can't be right.
You're a young earth creationist, aren't you?

If you want to believe these two crackpots instead of people doing
real research, go ahead. But do me one favor: spend some time
finding out what all the fuss is really about instead of just hunting
for sites that make you feel good. I suggest you start he

A man considered "the father of scientific climatology" is all of the
sudden a crackpot? Wow, you really have bought the Gore and company
propaganda hook, line and sinker.


http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

I didn't see a whole lot of interest above. I'm amazed at the
rationalizations some so-called scientists will stoop to in an effort
to support a faulty hypothesis.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13

There is much more evidence that warming causes high CO2 levels than
there is for the converse, yet the rationalizations continue.


A statement in itself that displays an ignorance that is breathtaking.

Stop sniffing cordite, Matt.

oops, sorry, you killfiled me, dincha?


Bertie