Both good but I agree that Cessna wins my vote.

A week or two back I heard an Australian reg Gulfstream VH-CCC report
altitude at FL500. Yikes!!

http://www.airliners.net/search/phot...nct_entry=true

Is the Cessna capable of these levels?

Graham

"A Guy Called Tyketto" wrote in message
et...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I'll throw this over here too, since it's over at the
LiveATC.net forums.

Gulfstream V's flight track:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/G...538Z/KATW/KATW

Cessna's flight track:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N...757Z/KICT/KICT

Who had it better, and why? Discuss.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1iOuyBkZmuMZ8L8RAu8yAJsFDBP137rUhwj32e8/IbK3kQfpawCg7pS4
m6SvZiK1iV2WIb365m9O5us=
=JJ8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----