Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:31:12 -0700 (PDT), Dan
wrote:

On Mar 18, 4:39 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:


That said, it is patently apparent to any thinking person, that a
doctrine of an-eye-for-an-eye must necessarily lead to perpetual
war;

The doctrine of an "eye for an eye" was a limitation, not a
requirement.


Huh? Who suggested that it was either? Not me.

An-eye-for-an-eye was the common sentiment of non-Christians at the
time of Christ, as I understand it, and it's still practiced
throughout the unenlightened world.


Yeah, like the Bible Belt.



Bertie