On Apr 7, 8:46*pm, "Nunya" wrote:
Well shedding light into the murky darkness is usually a good thing, no?
The only thing I can figure is that after people spend hours in traffic, a
skycar that promises relief from that crawl sounds appealing. *Imagine if
people really had skycars? *There would be a whole new round of problems to
be legislated: No taking off from *roads. *No landing on roads. *No flying
under bridges or overpasses, new speed limits for the air lanes above roads,
and new term for skycar crashes: skysplats.
-Tom
--
-Tom"ULWA" wrote in message

. ..





Is it just me... or is anyone else sick of when ever Moller advertises
something or gets a new spot, someone here
has to bring it to light ?

Dont worry... we still luv ya Tom. G

"Nunya" * Tom wrote
Is it just me or is anybody else sick of seeing the Moller Skycar on
magazine covers and on TV shows with exuberent hosts giggling in the
front seat? *How does he get so much good PR with such miserable results
to show for so many millions spent? *I just don't get it...
-Tom in Colorado

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then there is the totally overlooked item. Putting even half of the
current traffic into 'skycars' would only move the traffic jams into
the sky with no overall improvement. Also the problem of average joe
and his inability to even control a car properly.

Harry K