View Single Post
  #3  
Old April 26th 08, 04:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Frank Olson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 90
Default Turbo prop question

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Frank Olson" wrote in message
news:0ShQj.90501$rd2.26964@pd7urf3no...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Chris W wrote in news:74gQj.67968$y05.19485
@newsfe22.lga:

I was channel surfing the other day and caught the tail end of some
show
about rich people and their planes. Anyway the pilot of this one
single
engine turbo prop said there was no mechanical connection between the
prop and engine. How can that be?


I didn't catch the name of the plane. but as I remember, there were 4
seats in the passenger area, and it was pretty roomy. The only other
distinctive thing I can remember is it had a fairly large cargo door
with a power assist to close it because it was so far over head when
it
was open.



It's a free turbine. Most modern turboprops use that system. There's a
seperate turbine that runs the prop geabox. He's technically incorrect
since that turbine is part of the engine... Bertie


Rich people. More money than brains.


Envious people - generally stupid.




Touché! :-)