In article ,
"Howard" wrote:

"Mike Noel" wrote in message
news
On AvWeb:
New GA Fuel Promises Better Range, Lower Cost

"Not only can our fuel seamlessly replace the aviation industry's standard
petroleum fuel [100LL], it can outperform it," says John Rusek, a
professor at Purdue University and co-founder of Swift Enterprises. The
company recently unveiled a new general aviation fuel that it says will be
less expensive, more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendlier than
any on the market. Unlike other alternative fuels, Rusek said, SwiftFuel
is made of synthetic hydrocarbons that are derived from biomass, and it
can provide an effective range greater than 100LL, while costing about
half as much to produce. "Our fuel should not be confused with
first-generation biofuels like E-85 [85 percent ethanol], which don't
compete well right now with petroleum," Rusek said. Patented technology
can produce the 1.8 million gallons per day of fuel used by GA in the U.S.
by using just 5 percent of the existing biofuel plant infrastructure, the
company said.

The synthetic fuel is 15 to 20 percent more fuel-efficient, has no sulfur
emissions, requires no stabilizers, has a 30-degree lower freezing point
than 100LL, introduces no new carbon emissions, and is lead-free, Rusek
said. In addition, he said, the components of the fuel can be formulated
into a replacement for jet/turbine fuels. The company now is working with
the FAA to evaluate the fuel.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel


Don't know anything about this but first thing I thought of was the miracle
of "cold fusion". I can only hope it is true.and it is available.

At first glance, it appears that it would have to be one of the
aromatics or paraffin-based hydrocarbons to get that kid of increase in
output and octane rating.

You would probably have to replace all of the hoses on switchover, as
the MAterials take on a "set," based on the type of fuel being used
(petroleum or aromatic).

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.