In rec.aviation.piloting Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:35 pm, wrote:
In rec.aviation.piloting Ken S. Tucker wrote:

On Jun 18, 11:12 am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:
I love it when great minds come together.
Yeah, and electric/electronic chopper that can
sit in your backyard, taking up minimal space
that you fly with a flick of a switch quietly so the
old bag next door can't hear it over her vibrator.

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the greater than an order of
magnitude improvements in batteries necessary to do this.

Going to hard to keep all that moving air quiet.

I'm thinking contra-rotating multiple (bi-plane or triplane)
helo blades for yaw control, and I'm still working on
pitch...easy to do, but's what's best??

If it is so easy, why do few have it?

It's in production.

So was "Howard the Duck" and the Yugo.

I'm also lookin' at an emergency chute that can
pop off the top for a 1/2 assed decent, so we might
eliminate pitch control on the blades, and make it
cheaper and simpler, in case of failure, than having
to do reverse auto gyroration.

Deploying a chute through rotor blades is going to be interesting to
say the least.

It's patented. The chute is fired off the hub.

Patents are meaningless as to the value of a concept.

I bet we could form a team of fella's who could create
a Limited Liabilty Corporation. That's how Boeing began,
21 guys as I recall.

I'm sure you can find others that slept through high school science
and haven't a clue.

I'm ok with science, insight is needed.

More like a set of eyeglasses.

I think we should start a new thread and put this
product together.
What do you think?
Ken S. Tucker

That you are 12, maybe 13.

LOL, I wish!

OK, 9 or may be 10?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.