On Jun 29, 12:01*pm, Mark Borgerson wrote:
In article caa4e8fe-7afd-4102-88ae-c432bde27500@
8g2000hse.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jun 27, 7:42*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:
:It looks like the P-8 is going to use expendable UAV's to look
:at surface targets too:
:
:http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController....
:
:Using expendable UAV's for routine missions like this could get
:expensive after awhile.
:
Apparently that costs less than the loss of airframe life from using
the airplane to do it, which is why it's being considered.
--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *-- Charles Pinckney
I just spent 40 minutes responding to this post with an explanation of
what airborne ASW could do to really be part of the game and become a
serious threat to Submarines. *It was really cool and relatively
inexpensive.
Then I realized what the hell I was doing and which side I favored so
I deleted the entire post.
I'm really glad I did, because while it would have been interesting to
see what some of you would have done with it, picking it apart and
playing with it, I know there are some very good S-T&E's here that
might have found a way to make it work. *And that scared the hell out
of me.
It would probably have been an interesting discussion. *As for making
it work---there might be people out there to do that. *However, *I
suspect that ONR is keeping a good number of them busy with similar
ideas. * From my semi-insider point of view, *there are more ideas
than engineers, *scientists, and research dollars in the US now. *That
balance may be different in China and Iran. *They may have some
different set *of ideas, *funding and engineers. *The ideas are
probably most easily exported from the US, so let's be a bit
stingy with those!
Mark Borgerson
The idea was simple enough but it took full advantage sensitive
knowledge from the hunted side that would be inappropriate for the
group.
BB
I guess everybody has some mountain to climb in their life.
It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet.