Thread
:
Conventional v tricycle gear
View Single Post
#
2
July 9th 08, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 3,735
Conventional v tricycle gear
wrote in news:fb6e5c00-c3fe-4ab3-8031-
:
On Jul 7, 11:42 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
if a nose up profile on the ground is such an advantage
why not just lengthen the front strut
Now that would be messy! You'd just have a wheelbarrow, then.
Trikes are full of compromises. Lengthen the nose strut (or
inflate it more)to get the prop up away from the rocks and guys who
land too fast will wheelbarrow it. So the manufacturer and the
mechanic both have to take poor airmanship into account.
Give me a taildragger. It won't forgive poor airmanship, so
that a pilot either smartens up or buys a boat.
Yep
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
Find all threads started by Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]