"Hobo" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Kevin Brooks" wrote:

Why? Other (conventional) rotary aircraft currently within operating
inventopries are susceptable to VRS and manage to handle it by knowing
the
limits--why do you think the V-22 should somehow be different?
Illogical.

Brooks

It's not illogical if the V-22 is so much more susceptible to this that
the frequency of occurence during routine use is far greater than normal
helos.

But apparently it is not "so much more susceptable" to it.

Brooks