Mike wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most realize.

Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful
purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive employees.

Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from management
who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably
some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to
identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll
find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
flight data position or they might volunteer for other non operational
tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will do
anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they do it
enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way into full
time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.


The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.

Most FAA managers are also LOSERS or STUPID so they go into
management, strap on the goose down knee pads blow a little
cock and before you know it they have risen to their level
of incompetence and inadequacy

Which one of those categories do you fit?? Mike......???