was XM question, now OT: politics
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:kMRuk.323286$yE1.15549@attbi_s21:
Not counting the McCain donors who've been pretending to be converted
Hilary supporters, the real former Hilary supporters don't plan to
vote against Obama, a man, by casting their vote for McCain, another
man whose politics are all the opposite of the party they support.
Even if he trots out a woman whose foreign policy expertise consists
of being located somewhere right across the ocean from Russia.
Another interesting aspect of Palin's choice as Veep is that the Obama
people *can't* criticize Palin's lack of experience without the
spotlight reflecting right back on their candidate's woeful lack of
testing.
Bottom line: Palin has more experience (and, more importantly, more
*executive* experience running a state government) than Obama has in
the Senate.
BTW: Your choice of language -- and bias -- is telling, Stella.
Imagine, a man "trotting out" a woman, like this is some sort of
equestrian event? Wow, if I had used that turn of phrase, you'd have
crucified me.
So, no wyou have a messiah complex?
Bertie
|