On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:22:57 +0200, Anonymous Remailer wrote:

More on what these new rules really mean:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...o-take-ov.html


These new rules mean nothing to me. I used to fly thousands of miles
a year. I stopped flying after an airline put me on their suspicion
list just because an alarm clock I was carrying that had a phosphorus
display backing set off their bomb sniffer. From that time until I
decided to no longer fly commercial again, I was triple screened. I
haven't flown for over 5 years now.
On another note, home land insecurity is trying to make all private
pilots and small planes conform to the big new anti-terror airline
rules.

Such as what? This is a complete exaggeration of the facts. This from a
GA pilot, are you?

This is totally unnecessary and just another power grab by
government to control every aspect of our lives in the name os
preventing terrorism. There has not been another terrorist attack
(excluding the flight 800 government cover up) since 911,

You say that as if proof is positive, it's not.

and no small
planes/private pilots have been involved in terrorism.

Because *you* know of none doesn't make it so.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJVydzNJrno