On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:54:07 -0800 (PST), More_Flaps wrote:

On Nov 16, 2:08Â*pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:34:08 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
LOL! The Great Warrior Dudley Dewright Henriques, now talking troll.
Query this.

A canard wing and a main wing (on a Cozy IV) reverse the rules of
decolage (compared to a Cessna 150x). Yes? Â*
--
Bear Bottoms
website:http://bearware.com

If you are asking me if the angles of incidence between the tail and
wing combination and canard and wing combination on the Cozy are
different on each type I'll refer you to Nat Puffer.

I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?


Is the question about aerodynamic or geoemetric decalage?

LOL

Cheers

I assume Using?

D aircraft drag
L aircraft lift
W total aircraft weight
W0 empty aircraft weight
Wp payload weight
V flight speed
S reference area (wing area)
b wing span
AR wing aspect ratio
CL aircraft lift coefficient
CD aircraft drag coefficient
CDA0 drag area of non-wing components
T propeller thrust
Tc thrust coefficient
Pprop propulsive thrust power ( ≡ T V )
Pshaft motor shaft power
R propeller radius
ηprop propeller efficiency
ηv profile efficiency (viscous loss)
ηi Froude efficiency (inviscid loss)
Re chord Reynolds number
câ„“ wing-airfoil profile lift coefficient
cd wing-airfoil profile drag coefficient
� air density
--
Meet Ari!
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh