On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:21:47 -0500, Gezellig wrote:

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I
said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed

To wit:

"I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?"

If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass
up and set you straight.
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-))

Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your
troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on.

http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy.

Contact me at anytime you have the ballz.

Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you
out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?"
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that
people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out
here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they
don't know the answers to your questions?

Proof-pudding

Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually
believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that
this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being
that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to
answer the question does NOT?

Proof-pudding

Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting.
Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we?

Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation
groups in order to pull new trolls in?

Seriously?

Old, bored, washed-up...what else has he got to do?
--
Meet Ari!
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh