View Single Post
  #86  
Old November 17th 08, 05:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.comp.freeware
Maxwell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,043
Default What happened to Jay?]


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
On Nov 16, 6:54 am, More_Flaps wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:08 pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:



On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:34:08 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
LOL! The Great Warrior Dudley Dewright Henriques, now talking troll.
Query this.


A canard wing and a main wing (on a Cozy IV) reverse the rules of
decolage (compared to a Cessna 150x). Yes?
--
Bear Bottoms
website:http://bearware.com


If you are asking me if the angles of incidence between the tail and
wing combination and canard and wing combination on the Cozy are
different on each type I'll refer you to Nat Puffer.


I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?


Is the question about aerodynamic or geoemetric decalage?

LOL

Cheers


Believe it or not it's a viable question as he asked it. I just don't
like the way it was asked :-))
Dudley

--------------------------------

You don't like the way anyone does anything, unless they kiss your ass
first.