 
			
				November 18th 08, 04:04 AM
			
			
			
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.comp.freeware
		
  
	 | 
	| 
		
		
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
			
			
				 
				 What happened to Jay?]
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:20:33 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: 
 
 On Nov 18, 12:51*pm, Franklin see_REPLY-TO_header wrote: 
 On Tue 18 Nov08 06:59, Dudley Henriques  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Nov 18, 7:14*am, Franklin see_REPLY-TO_header wrote: 
 On Mon 17 Nov08 23:30, Dudley Henriques  wrote 
 in news:60ccd111-02f8-4eae-bb7a-582816c86b45 
 @v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com: 
 
  On Nov 17, 10:23*am, Payton Byrd 
   wrote: 
  [...] 
 
  You missed the term "increasing" I'm afraid. 5.5 squared is 30.5, 
  which is fine for pure math, but not fine for a turning F14 with 
  a linear expanding g profile. 
  The 25 figure as stated in the assumption is correct within the 
  problem. 
 
  Fun isn't it? 
 
 Sir, please sir. The Ps value is far too low. 
 
 Good try but no cigar I'm afraid. No Ps value is possible for ANY 
 aircraft without the inclusion of altitude in the equation. 
 Ps can be positive or negative anywhere in the envelope not on the 
 Ps0 line for the aircraft, BUT establishing that Ps value in any 
 turn is directly related to the altitude where the turn parameters 
 are in play. 
 
 I see that now. Ok. My mistake. 
 
 I have no idea who you're trying to impress here, but you 
 unfortunately picked the wrong guy :-) The purpose of my work with 
 the Turkey was related to EM :-)) 
 
 You asked a question. I thought I could answer it. I got it wrong but I'd 
 like another go! 
 
 You don't give altitude so I will assume it. *You made me re-examine 
 where I went wrong with Ps. And look up some F-14 specs. Specific excess 
 power Ps is delta energy with delta time. Accounting for induced drag 
 which the question focuses on then (assumming weight is approx 55 klbs) 
 at that state I say you would get acceleration. 
 
 Going over the various possibilities it seemed (not entirely sure) that 
 greater thrust should encounter even greater drag and so airspeed could 
 fall. *Am I getting closer? 
 
 If you want to talk energy maneuverability be my guest. 
 Dudley Henriques 
 
 That's for a John Boyd! What a maverick. I couldn't hope to match his 
 stunts to highlight E-M. 
  
 Sorry for my offensive post. Things have been nuts around here lately 
 with all these characters and I thought you might be another one :-) 
  
 Yes, your second try is exactly right. In the example given, if the g 
 is decreased the Turkey will accelerate which is the answer to the 
 first question, and if the g is increased, airspeed will fall victim 
 to drag. 
  
 Another way to present the "problem" would be as follows, only this 
 time including the altitude which as you have correctly surmised, 
 gives us a Ps figure for the F14. In our example, the Turkey is at T- 
 D=0 which = Ps=0 or on the Ps equals zero line for the F14. 
  
 An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is 
 increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag 
 has increased by a factor of 25. At this point, T-D=0 and Ps=0. If g 
 is decreased the F14 will accelerate. If we pull harder, airspeed will 
 drop off. 
  
 Thank you for explaining your post instead of reacting to my over 
 aggressive response to you. 
 Dudley Henriques
Ben's a doll.
 
Really. 
--  
Meet Ari!
 http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |