bildan wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:45 am, " wrote:
Having done most of my flying at lower altitudes, I have wondered
about the contradicton between my unscientific observations when
flying at high altitude and what I would expect from my somewhat
limited knowledge of physics and aerodymanics. I certainly believe
that true airspeed increases with altitude. I use a rule of thumb of
about 2 percent per thousand. So (at 17,000 feet) a Indicated
airspeed of 42 knots becomes 56 knots true airspeed. An indicated
airspeed of 70 knots becomes 94 knots true airspeed. It just does not
feel like or the instruments don't seem to indicate sink rates (I have
made no careful observations) one would expect for the higher true air
speeds. Is there no free lunch?

Some varios are accurately compensated for altitude and others are
not. My excellent altitude compensated Borgelt varios seem to be very
good at helping me find heart stopping sink. ):

Flying high is very much like carrying ballast.

A LOT of ballast! To achieve the ~34% increase in TAS you get at 17,000'
would take a wing loading increase of ~84% at sea level.

I wonder if there is
a performance reason to carry less water ballast when you expect to
fly high.

Pilots in Nevada and elsewhere that fly at 18,000' routinely stuff in
all the ballast the glider can hold, so apparently not.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org