On 26 Dec 2003 23:05:38 -0800, wrote:


Actually, you have failed to answer any of the questoins raised in
my post.

Not "failed" - Dismissed.

You cannot 'dismiss' something you have no answer for.

Your loaded questions attempted to enforce
an antipacifist playing field.

ROFLMAO! How is asking for a meaningful alternative enforcing the
'antipacifist playing field'.

What pomo PC school did you attend to learn that piece of meaningless
verbiage ?

The point of my post was to explain
why such questions are irrelevant.

Needless deaths of allied forces in the field as a consequence of the
japanese not been taken out of the fight are highly relevant.

My maternal grandfather would most likely have been on an RN ship off the
coast of Japan somewhere supporting Olympic and Coronet.

again. Concerns aren't "real" unless they braid into *your* world
view?

The mass murder of chinese civilians at a rate of approximately 10000/day
were quite real I can assure you.

The only "real concern" regarding atomic/nuclear weapons is
that they never be used (or glorified or patriotized).

Given you haven't told us what *you* would have done to prevent the mass
murder of civilians accross asia by japanese forces. The only 'real
concern' here is how civilians have to die to keep your PC conscience clean
60 odd years after the event.



When confronted with facts opposing your viewpoint, you seem to
have no ability to meet them with anything more effective than
"military industrial bias" comments

Nothing "more effective" is necessary.

On the contrary, the depth of your ignorance is comical.


greg
--
Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland.
I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan.
You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide.