"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling
units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of
various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or
shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under
~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the
"Boeing
CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

All very false, Ralph is lying and has not a clue.

Ok in "Detail & Specifics" explain;
What is "Very False?
Why am I allegedly "Lying About"?
What is it I do not have a "Clue About" regarding the "Inherent Dangers"
associated with "The Boeing CWT Design Philosophy"?

In the above context I am using the Term "Inherent Dangers" as defined/used
by the Liability Insurance Industry.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type