View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 11th 09, 05:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Some technical considerations related to Spot trackingperformance

On Mar 11, 6:00*am, wrote:
On Mar 11, 4:24*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:



On Mar 10, 7:56*pm, wrote:


I have mine on my parachute chest strap and I am seated reclined, so
the front face is about at a 45 degree angle. *I get pretty good
tracking results.


You said you tested it with the logo side up and down. *I assumed that
the device was designed with the belt strap on the back side so that
the logo would face horizonally / the horizon. It appears as they
intended it to hang vertically. Did you test it in this orientation?


Chris


The SPOT messenger is a fantastic product, but because of it's
internal technology, and in spite of it's poor industrial design.
There must have been a disconnect somewhere between the product
management, *the ID team/design house and engineering. And it's likely
literally this type of issue as the engineering is all done by Axonn a
separate company than SPOT and Globalstar and I'm sure SPOT or Axonn
contracted out the industrial and mechanical design work.


So for the antennas (both the GPS and Globalstar) a planar antenna
pointing *at the horizon is far from optimal, half the usable
beamwidth would be lost in obstructions below the horizon. It is
actually worse than that simple model because of satellite orbit
geometry and satellite antenna footprint. So the belt clip is designed
to hold the unit, but not reallly while it is in use. Pretty stupid
huh.


The lack of though about how to mount the unit on a car dashboard or
other location, the overloading of the button functions, the
overloading of the dual blinking LEDs, different LED patterns that
mean things that are not clearly explained are other examples of poor
design.


However the SPOT messenger is a great device (I really like mine) and
hopefully SPOT will correct some of the ID snd usability weaknesses in
future products, and/or provide products more tailored to different
uses/markets.


Darryl


So.... that is a long way of saying "no you did not test it with the
logo facing the horizon" ;-).
I'd still be curious to know the performance of the logo facing
horizontally. *Theories may abound on what might happen but until it
is tested you don't really know.
Chris


Yes but the long answer was to try to explain that the apparent design
of the product has nothing to do with proper use. Reading the manual
would also show you this.

I did not do any tests since I know horizontal is best and I can
arrange that in my glider. If you can't get them horizontal the
interesting question is how far off horizontal is acceptable. Going to
the extreme case of vertical is not interesting for the reasons I
mentioned.

If you don't beleive that you are welcome to do the test and report
the results here. That time might be more usefully spent reading about
antenna theory/properties, and how Globalstar and GPS work. That way
maybe not only might you realize it is not an interesting experiment
but once you get the results you will (almost no position reports),
you will be able to understand them. :-O


Darryl