View Single Post
  #10  
Old April 22nd 09, 04:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 75
Default Those Whacky RC DS guys

On Apr 21, 12:21*am, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Adam wrote:
The AMA limit is 55 pounds. However the AMA does not regulate, only
insure, lobby, and liaise. So if you want to be covered by the AMA
policy that membership affords, you best follow the AMA safety code
found he


http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/105.pdf


Wow, they've really raised the weight limit since I was flying models!

Also, the thermal fliers regularly exceed the 400 feet, don't they? Not
likely an issue for the dynamic soarers, I suppose. Personally, I've
never even seen a model while I've been flying, except waaay down there
on a slope soaring hill.



The FAA has this to say with regards to model aviation:
http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/540-C.pdf


This document is 28 years old. Does the FAA know what's going on now?

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* * * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


Eric,

The document is current. Read the following regarding current
developments in UAVs and current model practice (same as 1981):

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-2402.htm

I repeat, AMA is not "law", just a lobbying group and insurer. I have
no idea from where the 55 pound limit comes.

DS, slope and thermal planes can all easily exceed 400' but FAA
recommends against such activities.

What is your concern with today's modeling practices?

/Adam