On Nov 16, 5:41*pm, a wrote:
On Nov 16, 4:25*pm, Mark wrote:





On Nov 16, 12:48*pm, Ross wrote:

Darkwing wrote:

"Mark" wrote in message
...
I remember a couple of years ago doing a
search of where mandatory Aviation Insurance
is required for small plane owners, and it
revealed that only 3 American states had
mandatory requirements. South Carolina was
one, and I don't remember what the other 2
states were.

Well, talking to a fellow at the airport the other
day, I was telling him that the insurance for
a new low wing plane was going to eat me
alive. He then told me to look into a Delaware
offshore LLC status to buy my plane through.
He said I could also circumvent paying taxes
too.

This Delaware LLC thing looks for real to me.

---
Mark

If you're an AOPA member call their legal services line, it's free to
members.

You will get advice, but the real legal services plans are extra. I
carried during the 12 years I owned an airplane for that "just in case".
I also carried insurance even though I owned it outright from the git go.

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
Sold
KSWI

- Show quoted text -

Don't get me wrong. I realize that insurance is the prudent
way to go, but a CFI I spoke with said they might not write
me in a high speed experimental, and if they do, it's going
to be very expensive.

---
Mark

Mark, that gets back to my point. *If the history of the experimental
is bad you'll be paying a lot of money. I'm not especially worried
about hull insurance (if you can buy an airplane you may be in a position
to self insure the hull) but liability is the issue. You want to not
be in a position where a bodily harm accident can lead to a suit that
may take everything you own. It's not just you being a pilot that puts
you at risk if someone thinks your pockets are deep. a lawyer may
suggest moving some liquid assets out of reach just as a matter of
prudent financial planning.

Well, see, this goes back to my original point about the Delaware
LLC. According to my research most of the fortune 500 companies
are based there due to the extreme level of personal liability
protection
that is offered. All states are legally bound to recognise your legal
entity there, and are bound by law to do business with your legal
corporation. It just makes sense not to own anything in your own
name that can be owned by a corporation, especially one that isn't
even bound by courts to turn over records.

See...http://www.incnow.com/

So I'm not looking to skirt the law, but to just play by the same
rules
as the big boys. They're untouchable and we can be too.

Insurance is a good idea, but if there is an incident I think it would
fall
into 2 categories.

1- I break something which is gonna come out of my pocket
anyway, given a high deductable, ie, $5000.00. So why not
just figure on being self insured?

2- I total the plane and am not around to worry about the pieces.
I figure any damage over 50,000 is unsustainable anyway.

Other than this, I want the plane insured in the hanger for the
typical unattended hazards.

I don't mind paying $125,000 one time for something i can put
my hands on, as opposed to paying $300 - $500 a month for
years for something I may never need, or like I said, being
told that I cannot fly my plane because they don't want me to.

I called a couple of companies today, but it was a "leave a
message and we'll call you back" deal. I figured if they want
my premium, they should make themselves available for my
call.

---
Mark