Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Bug Dout wrote:

cavelamb writes:

This came in by email this evening.
Anybody heard anything about it?
Sounds like an alphabet aviation group trying to scare its members for
more dollars. The federal bogeyman has replaced the commies under the
bed and the monsters in the closet.

The threat on through-the-fence operations is quite serious! The new reg
attempts to do away with taxiway access from off-airport property
residences and businesses. There are some airports that have adjacent
hangar homes or businesses that have airport access and are in danger of
having their access denied.


I concur...I read that section very close.

Another section I found interesting (if I read it correctly as I breezed
through it)...storing cars, lumber, etc. in a hangar is an
"inconsistent" use of land on airport property...

Scott