Just an educated guess.. just like the liberals who point out that Gore
would have probably won if Nader had not run. BTW I think they are
right....Bush SR disenfranchised a lot of conservatives with his "read my
lips no new taxes" pledge and turned around and voted for the Dems tax
package. What gets me is the Dems attacks on the so-called "conservative"
Bush clan. They are not as conservative as they would like you to believe.
Most aristocrats aren't.

"Steve Krulick" wrote in message
...
Morton Davis wrote:

"Zippy the Pinhead" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:04:30 GMT, "Gorf" wrote:

So did his father at this time of the election . I think Bush SR had
70%
approval and still lost. To be fair I have to mention that Bush SR
had
Perot
to deal with.

Not only that, but back then this country still had its head so far up
its ass that it thought the job in the Middle East was done, and
clinton was promising his retinue of whimpering victim groups a share
of the "peace dividend".

Perot carried my county. Clinto "won" because of Perot.

The numbers don't bear that out. Care to cite REAL figures that
show that, BrainDead?

CITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-*MORT*-
BrainDead, and slave to urban legends.

--
Steven Krulick /
Ellenville NY 12428-130727