"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

No, would you mind translating the vacant spaces for me?


I said "the following message", not "what appears below."

So, where's "the following message"? There wasn't any....so why were you
referring to it when it obviously didn't exist? You knew it wasn't there.

He was referring to the clarification of his obvious typo. He explained that
to you.


Your attempts at wiggling out of admitting an error are really pathetic
for
someone who's presumably an adult.

No, what is growing increasingly pathetic is your fascination with his typo.
Rather than address what he really said (in clarified form), you instead
cling to this typo as if were a lifering thrown out while you are treading
water in the middle of the ocean.

They don't serve you well, and you ought to
be man enough to admit it when it's as obvious as the nose on your face
that you
misspoke or, as you probably would have said if I had done that, that you
lied.

For cripes sake, he did no such thing. You may be trying to twist his words
into a "lie", but you have done a rather miserable job of it so far. I had
come to the conclusion that you and I just tend to disagree on a lot of
issues, but that you are generally an honorable man--it appears now,
however, that I was wrong in that last bit. You alternatively snarl and
whine about all things allegedly Bush-related, refuse to address the
statistics that question your rants, drop the Nazi card on your opponent for
absolutely no reason, and now you have hung yourself around his admitted
typo and just can't let loose. You just graduated to the exalted level of
Kramer, Tarver, and Vkince--what a team! Hope you are proud of it.

Brooks